Evaluation of ornamental traits of apple trees from the collection of I. V. Michurin Federal Scientific Center

Ornamental species of apple trees have gained large popularity in landscape design. The long-term work of Russian breeders has resulted in the selection of a number of ornamental apple-tree forms; however, insufficient attention has been paid to their practical implementation. At present, the Russian market is mainly represented by European varieties, which are unstable to the harsh conditions of Russian regions. The creation of adaptive varieties of ornamental apple trees with high aesthetic characteristics appears to be a relevant research task. In this work, ornamental apple tree forms for use in landscape design are evaluated using the methodology developed by V. V. Vasekha et al. (2017). Studies were conducted in the 2015-2022 period in experimental plots located in Michurinsk, Tambov Oblast. Research objects included trees planted in 2004 with a planting scheme of 6×2 m using 54-118 rootstocks. Depending on the genotype, the bud color was found to vary from white (M. sachalinensis), bright red (M. floribunda), and purple (M. purpurea pendula, Jay Darling, etc.). The new forms 7-13, 7-29, 4-100, and Nikas were characterized by large flowers over 35 mm in diameter. The leaf color varied depending on the season, from purple and red-purple in spring to green in autumn, which was typical of the majority of the studied genotypes. In summer, the genotypes having purple leaves turn red-green with the exception for the Royalty variety and M. purpurea var. aldenhamensis and M. purpurea species, whose leaves remain red until autumn. Fruits of ornamental apple trees are small, from 8 to 35 mm in diameter. Such varieties and forms, as Royalty, Profusion, M. sargentii, M. purpurea, M. floribunda, M. sachalinensis, M. Nikita floribunda, Jay Darling, Altaiskoe bagryanoe, M. floribunda, Nikas, 7-29, 7-13, and 4-100 are characterized by fruits up to 15 mm in diameter with high aesthetic characteristics. Nikas, 7-29, 7-13, and 4-100 have a columnar crown habitus, which significantly increases their ornamental value.

1. Barsukova O. N. Dekorativnyye vidy yabloni. Subtropicheskoye i dekorativnoye sadovodstvo. 2011;45:21-26. (in Russ.)

2. Barsukova O. N. Pozdnotsvetushchiye sorta i vidy yabloni v kollektsii VIR, podderzhivayemoy na Maykopskom filiale, Tr. po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selektsii. 2016;177(3):74-81. (in Russ.)

3. Vasil’yeva M. N., Kozlovskaya Z. A., Vasekha V. V., Yakimovich O. A., Taranov A. A. Dekorativnyye sorta plodovykh kul’tur kollektsii RUP «institut plodovodstva» NAN Belarusi. Subtropicheskoye i dekorativnoye sadovodstvo. 2019;71:35-45. (in Russ.)

4. Kozlovskaya Z. A. Dekorativnyye yabloni. Nauka i innovatsii. 2015;5:147.

5. Kozhevnikov A. P., Yegorov R. V. Dekorativnyye formy yabloni gibridnoy (Malus hybrida) v ozelenitel’nykh posadkakh Yekaterinburga. Lesa Rossii i khozyaystvo v nikh. 2020;4(75):21-28. (in Russ.)

6. Kulikov I. M., Artyukhova A. V. Dekorativnoye sadovodstvo Rossii: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Subtropicheskoye i dekorativnoye sadovodstvo. 2008;41:3-11. (in Russ.)

7. Kuliyev A. S., Akmatakunova B. T. Dekorativnaya yablonya Nedzvetskogo i vyrashchivaniye yabloni. Izvestiya Natsional’noy Akademii nauk Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki. 2019;5:48-50. (in Russ.)

8. Kuleshova Y. U. A. Otsenka esteticheskikh kachestv dekorativnykh form yabloni. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nyye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii: sbornik statey VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 4 ch., Penza, 05 iyunya 2019 goda – Penza: “Nauka i Prosveshcheniye”. 2019;1:96-98. (in Russ.)

9. Kuleshova Y. U. A. Ispol’zovaniye yablon’ dekorativnogo naznacheniya v ob’yektakh landshaft noy arkhitektury. Nauka v XXI veke: sovremennoye sostoyaniye, problemy i perspektivy: Sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. V 2 ch., Perm’, 25 maya 2019 goda, Perm’: «Aeterna». 2019;2:26-28. (in Russ.)

10. Feshchenko Ye. M. Otsenka esteticheskikh kachestv i adaptivnosti introdutsirovannykh dekorativnykh yablon’ Orenburgskogo filiala FNTS Sadovodstva. Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2021;67:78-88. (in Russ.)

11. Savel’yeva N. N., Yushkov A. N., Zemisov A. S. Perspektivnyye sorta i genotipy yabloni selektsii Federal’nogo nauchnogo tsentra im. I. V. Michurina. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2017;31(7):20-22. (in Russ.)

12. Savel’yev N. I., Savel’yeva N. N., Savel’yeva I. N. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ vyrashchivaniya kolonnovidnykh sortov yabloni. Adaptivnyy potentsial i kachestvo produktsii sortov i sorto-podvoynykh kombinatsiy plodovykh kul’tur: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf, Orol. 2012, 212-214. (in Russ.)

13. Vasekha V. V., Kozlovskaya Z. A. Karunak – novyy sort dekorativnoy yabloni. Zemledeliye i rasteniyevodstvo. 2018;5:52-55. (in Russ.)

14. Kornilov B. B., Ozherel’yeva Z. Ye., Dolmatov Ye. A., Khrykina T. A. Rezul’taty izucheniya zimostoykosti nekotorykh dekorativnykh sortoobraztsov yabloni genofonda FGBNU VNIISPK v kontroliruyemykh usloviyakh. Sovremennoye sadovodstvo. 2020;1:16-22. (in Russ.)

15. Gosudarstvennyy reyestr selektsionnykh dostizheniy RF, dopushchennykh k ispol’zovaniyu. Sorta rasteniy. M., 2022, 645 р. (in Russ.)

16. Savel’yev N. I., Shamshin I. N., Savel’yeva N. N., Lyzhin A. S. Polimorfizm dikorastushchikh vidov roda Malus Mill. po genu (MD-Exp-7) biosinteza ekspansina. Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selektsii. 2014;18(4/1):713-717. (in Russ.)

17. Savel’yev N. I., Lyzhin A. S., Savel’yeva N. N. Geneticheskoye raznoobraziye roda Malus Mill po genam ustoychivosti k parshe. Rossiyskaya sel’skokhozyaystvennaya nauka. 2016;4:21-24. (in Russ.)

18. Makarenko S. A., Kotov L. A. Dekorativnaya yablonya na Urale i v Sibiri. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selektsii. 2018;179(4):17-27. DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2018-4-17-27. (in Russ.)

19. Kornilov B. B., Dolmatov Ye. A., Khrykina T. A. Esteticheskiye kharakteristiki nekotorykh dekorativnykh sortoobraztsov yabloni genofonda FGBNU VNIISPK i model’ ideal’nogo sorta etoy kul’tury dlya sredney polosy Rossii. Sovremennoye sadovodstvo. Contemporary horticulture. 2019;4:45-55. (in Russ.)

20. Yushkov A. N., Savelieva N. N., Borzykh N. V., Zemisov A. S., Chivilev V. V. Special characteristics of water regime of high-potential decorative varieties and forms of the genus malus mill. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management and Applied Sciences and Technologies. 2020;11(10):11.

21. Kornilov B. B., Ozherel’yeva Z. Ye. Zimostoykost’ i zasukhoustoychivost’ nekotorykh form dekorativnoy yabloni genofonda FGBNU VNIISPK. Sovremennoye sadovodstvo. 2017;4:49-56. (in Russ.)

22. Nigmatyanova S. E., Mursalimova G. R. Vodnyy rezhim i zasukhoustoychivost’ dekorativnykh kul’tur roda MALUS MILL. v usloviyakh Priural’ya. Sovremennoye sadovodstvo. 2017;4:57-62. (in Russ.)

23. Yushkov A. N., Savel’yeva N. N., Borzykh N. V., Zemisov A. S., Chivilev V. V., Vislobokov A. V. Otsenka ustoychivosti dekorativnykh form yabloni k abioticheskim stressoram. Materialy vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem, posvyashchennoy 165-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya I. V. Michurina, Michurinsk-naukograd RF. Sankt-Peterburg: OOO «Skifiya-print». 2021, 299-304. (in Russ.)

24. Yushkov A. N., Savel’yeva N. N., Zemisov A. S., Chivilev V. V., Vislobokov A. V. Potentsial ustoychivosti dekorativnykh sortov i form yabloni k nizkim temperaturam. Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2020;60(1):81-86. https://doi.org/10.31676/2073-4948-2020-60-81-86. (in Russ.)

25. Vasekha V. V., Kozlovskaya Z. A., Yankovskaya I. G. Metodika otsenki dekorativnykh priznakov yabloni. Sovremennoye sadovodstvo. Contemporary horticulture. 2017;3:74-81. DOI: 10.24411/2218-5275-2017-00019. (in Russ.)