Methodological approaches to biotechnological process management in the protection of perennial fruit plantations (codling moth as an example) based on digital technologies

In this work, we investigate the harmful effect of codling moth in industrial fruit plantations of Krasnodar Krai. An analysis of growing expenditures on protective measures is carried out in connection with the high dynamics of macroeconomic processes and sanction measures. A correlation between the distribution of codling moth and the magnitude of climate change is noted. The need to increase the efficiency of measures aimed at the development and implementation of plantation and crop protection is highlighted. According to long-term research studies into the bioecological features of the phytophage development during vegetation, its following adaptation features are established: high adaptivity to variable weather conditions; high potential of pest resurgence during one vegetation period; changes in the pest phenology; an increase in the overall number of pests in those sections of the orchard where trees grow for 15–16 years and more. A scheme for the automated control of monitoring processes, optimum regime selection, application of biorational systems of efficiency control based on digital technologies is proposed. The technology for managing biotechnological processes of fruit plantation protection is described in terms of functional components, including the formation of a system of ecological and economic parameters of implementing insecticides against harmful pests; development of multivariant models and adaptive instruments of phytosanitary stability management of apple-tree agrocenoses based on the criteria of biologicalization, ecologization, and rational nature management; monitoring of the number of pest populations; phytosanitary stability of apple-tree plantations; regulations for effective and safe use of biorational, low-toxic chemical and biological preparations of new generation in apple-tree plantations; evaluation of the action of the studied preparations on non-target organisms. The latter include fruit analysis for the presence of residual amounts of background and impact pesticides, determination of phytotoxic effects of used preparations on the protected plants, evaluation of the studied preparations action on associated pests. A comparative study of available technologies for crop protection against codling moth is carried out. The efficiency of biological methods in the field of crop protection is substantiated.

1. Economic cycles and the guidelines they give to investors and entrepreneurs. URL: https://economic_slovar.jofo.me/1737994.html?ysclid=leigjooy8a357597250. The link is active on 20.01.2023.

2. Podgornaya M. E. Phytosanitary problems of the garden and ways to solve them. Protection and quarantine of plants. 2021;9:3-8. DOI: 10.47528/1026-8634_2021_9_3.

3. Podgornaya M. E., Vasilchenko A.V., Kashchits Yu. P. et al. The current state of entomocenosis of fruit crops of the Krasnodar Territory. Scientific works of the North Caucasus Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture, Winemaking. 2021;31:52-57. DOI: 10.30679/2587-9847-2021-31-52-57.

4. Chernov V. V. Features of the formation of productivity and quality of apple fruits by optimizing the technology of protection against apple moth: dis. ... cand. agricultural farm. Sciences 06.01.08, Krasnodar, 2021, 131 p.

5. Egorov E. A., Shadrina Zh. A., Kochyan G. A. Economic conditions of sustainable development of industrial horticulture in the South of Russia. Gardening and viticulture. 2012;1:16-21.

6. Egorov E. A., Shadrina Zh. A., Kochyan G. A., Putilina I. N. Actual directions of increasing the efficiency of industrial fruit growing. 2018;5(1):28-32.

7. Egorov E. A., Shadrina Zh. A., Kochyan G. A. Methodological approaches to the biologization of intensification processes (on the example of industrial fruit growing). Fruit growing and viticulture in the South of Russia. 2021;71(5):1-22.

8. Management of biotechnological processes. Models, hard-ware and soft ware, SCADA systems // https://kazedu.com/referat/201622. The link is active on 18.01.2023.

9. Boev V. D., Sypchenko R. P. Computer modeling. M.: INTUIT, 2021, 517 p.

10. Nivorozhkina L. I., Arzhenovsky S. V. Multidimensional statistical methods in economics. Moscow: RIOR: PUBLISHING House, 2018, 203 p.

11. Nanotechnology as a key factor of the new technological order in the economy: ed. Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences S. Yu. Glazyev and Professor V. V. Kharitonov. M.: Trovant, 2009, 304 p.

12. Podgornaya M. E., Prakh S. V., Vasilchenko A. V., Didenko N. A. Biorational method for controlling the abundance of Cydia pomonella L. in apple agrocenoses of the Krasnodar region. International Scientific Conference “Biologization of the Intensification Processes in Horticulture and Viticulture” (BIOLOGIZATION 2021): International Scientific Conference, Krasnodar, Krasnodar, 2021;34:04013.

13. Egorov E. A., Podgornaya M. E., Shadrina Zh. A. et al. A system of ecological and economic indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of regulations for the effective use of biological and biorational means of combating harmful species in apple plantations. Fruit growing and viticulture in the South of Russia. 2022;78(6):368-382. DOI: 10.30679/2219-5335-2022-6-78-368-382.

14. Egorov E. A., Shadrina Zh. A., Kochyan G. A. Efficiency of biologization of intensification processes in industrial fruit growing. International Scientific Conference “Biologization of the Intensification Processes in Horticulture and Viticulture” (BIOLOGIZATION 2021): International Scientific Conference. 2021;34:01001. DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20213401001.

15. Popova V. P., Sergeeva N. N., Fomenko T.G. et al. Principles of increasing the resistance of garden cenoses to stress factors and changes in the level of soil fertility. Scientific works of the North Caucasus Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture, Winemaking. 2019;23;89-99.

16. Hantaş C., Çetin G., Akçay M. E. Marmara Bölgesi ayva bahçelerinde zararlı böcek ve akar türleri ile doğal düşmanlarının saptanması ve önemli zararlı türlerin popülasyon değişimi. Bitki Koruma Bülteni. 2014;54(3);283-302.

17. Tzanakakis M., Katsoyannos B. Insect Pests of Fruit Trees and Grapevine. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2021, 528 р.

18. Bakthatvatsalam N., Subharan K., Mani M. Semiochemicals and Their Potential Use in Pest Management in Horticultural Crops. In: Mani M. (eds). Trends in Horticultural Entomology. 2022;124:283-312. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-0343-4_9.

19. Handbook of pesticides and agrochemicals approved for use on the territory of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Litterra, 2022, 774 p.

20. SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 "Hygienic standards and requirements for ensuring the safety and (or) harmlessness of environmental factors for humans". 2021, 735 p.

21. Nurim Y., Asmara E.N. Industry Characteristics and Patterns of Sustainability Reports. Indonesian journal of sustain ability accounting and management. 2019;3:174-186.

22. Hosseinzadeh J., Karimpour Y., Farazmand H. Effect of lufox, on Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). F. Toxicology &Pest control. 2011;3(1):11-17.

23. Peterson C. A., Eviner V. Т., Gaudin А. С. M. Ways forward for resilience research in agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems. 2018;162:19-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.011.