The paradigm of the concept of the industrial garden landscape agrotechcenos

The estimation of the relevance of the garden landscape paradigm, consisting in the use of the parameters of the geographical environment for land management of the working plots in the territories of agricultural enterprises (agrotechcenoses) is given. The question of the approach to the solution of the problem is considered: between the point scale of information collection and the area nature of decision making in the design of industrial gardens. The shortcomings of modern methods of choice of the discreteness space for estimation garden suitable territories were analyzed. In order to create a scenario of the proposed methodology, we used the category of geographical space for optimization the placement of industrial garden plantations in the agricultural landscapes of agrotechnical communities. In conducting the research, methods and criteria were used for estimating the geographical space of landscapes of different scales and their capacity for systems that are lower in rank, starting with elementary ones. In the proposals of designs of garden landscaping were used the scientific basis of the build of its structure and landscape connections. For practical horticulture, the scenario of modeling the logic of the transition from geoto ecosystems with the indication of the universal spatial element – agroparcell is presented. In the development of knowledge about the scale of garden landscapes explanations of the importance of this inter-system transition associated with the transfer of characteristics of the ideas of ecology of landscape to the ideas of landscape ecology, and back. Translations of such characteristics were considered to explain the phenomena of the dynamics of the processes taking place in the geographical environment of garden landscapes and the search for ways of regulation (management) of the environmental situation. The developed models for estimating the suitability of land space, taking into account the knowledge of 2 schools of landscape studies, project agrogenic impact on the environment and adjusting the mechanisms of mass energy transfer in geo-and ecosystems with different scales, the use of convergent information and communication and co genitive technologies are of great practical importance.

1. Kiryushin V. I. Ecologization of agriculture and technological policy. Moscow: Publishing house MGSKHA, 2000, 413 p. (in Russian).

2. Methods of selection and evaluation of land for the laying of industrial plantations of fruit and small fruit crops, Ed. Yu. V. Trunov. Voronezh: Kvarta, 2012, 40 p. (in Russian).

3. System for the production of apple fruit in intensive gardens of the central part of Russia, Ed. Yu. V. Trunov. Voronezh: Kvarta, 2011, 182 p. (in Russian).

4. Instruction on the design of perennial plantations. Moscow: FGBNU «Rosinformagrotekh», 2014, 32 p. (in Russian).

5. Gordeyev A. S., Pridorogin M. V., Popov N. S., Badin A. E. Ecological-energetic approach of auditing the habitat in industrial gardens, Issues of modern science and practice. 2018;1:9-29. (in Russian).

6. Kudrin B. I. Introduction to Technetics. Tomsk: Publishing house Tomsk university, 1993, 552 p. (in Russian).

7. D’yakonov K. N. Geophysics of the landscape. Bioenergetics, models, problems. Moscow: Publishing house MSU, 1991, 96 p. (in Russian).

8. Reteyum A. Yu. Research facilities of landscape studies, Landscape science: theory, methods, regional studies, practice. Mater. XI Mezhd. landshaft. konf. Moscow: Geography faculty of MSU, 2006, 46-49. (in Russian).

9. Puzachenko Yu. G. Mathematical methods in ecological and geographical studies. Moscow: Akademiya, 2004, 416 p.

10. Mamay I. I. Dynamics and functioning of landscapes. Moscow: Publishing house MSU, 2005, 138 p. (in Russian).

11. Pridorogin M. V., Pridorogin V. K., Pridorogin Vl. K. Paradoxical relief. Michurinsk-naukograd RF: Publishing house MichGAU, 2014, 495 p. (in Russian).

12. Razumovskiy S. M. Works on ecology and biogeography. Moscow: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, 2011, 722 p. (in Russian).

13. Reymers N. F., Yablokov A. V. Dictionary of terms and concepts related to the protection of living nature, Moscow: Nauka, 1982, 144 p. (in Russian).

14. Dylis N. V. Fundamentals of biogeocenology, Moscow: Publishing house MSU, 1978, 152 p. (in Russian).

15. Protection of landscapes (explanatory dictionary), Ed. V. S. Preobrazhenskiy. Moscow: Progress, 1982, 272 p. (in Russian).

16. Khoroshev A. V. Polyscale organization of the geographical landscape. Moscow: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, 2016, 416 p. (in Russian).

17. Lastochkin A. N. Obshchaya teoriya geosistem, Saint Petersburg: Lemma, 2011, 980 p. (in Russian).

18. Kolbovskiy E. Yu. Landscape planning. Moscow: Akademiya, 2008, 336 p. (in Russian).

19. Forman R. T. T., Godron M. Landscape ecology. New York: John & Sons, 1986, 437 p.

20. McGarigal K., Marks B. J. 1995. Fragstats: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PNW: 351. Portland, OR, USA, 120 p.

21. Wu J., David J. L. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications, Ecological modeling. 2002; 153: 7-26.

22. Forman R. T. T. Land Mosaiks. Cambridge University Press, 2006, 632 p.