Preview

Horticulture and viticulture

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Drought resistance of grape varieties of various ecological and geografical origin

https://doi.org/10.31676/0235-2591-2020-5-37-41

Abstract

The article presents the results of the study of drought resistance of various grape varieties in the parameters of water regime and content of pigments. The objects of research were the grape varieties (interspecific hybrids) of the following origin: European-American (Dostoynyi, Krasnostop AZOS, Vostorg), Western European (Aligote), Eastern European (Zarif), Euro Amuro-American (Krystall). The aim of research was the comparative evaluation of resistance of grape varieties of different ecological-geographical origin to elevated temperatures and low water availability in the conditions of Anapa-Taman area, and selecting the most valuable genotypes. It was established that by the end of summer, the water content of leaf tissues decreased to varying degrees in all grape varieties, depending on their biological peculiarities. In the Kristall, Dostoyny, Krasnostop AZOS varieties, the water content of the tissues decreased to a lesser extent (by 4.0 - 4.1%) in comparison with Zarif and Aligote varieties (by 6.8 and 7.2 %, respectively). Kristall, Dostoyny, Krasnostop AZOS varieties showed the highest rates of the ratio of bound and free forms of water during the summer (2.01-2.50) due to the increased content of bound water. Same varieties are marked by a stable amount of chlorophyll content (a+b) during the summer, with some tendency to increase by 1,07- 1.18 times in August, and the increase in the proportion of carotenoids in the pigment complex, indicating an active adaptation of these varieties to drought and high temperatures. These parameters can be used as diagnostic characteristics to assess adaptive capacity of grapes.

About the Authors

N. I. Nenko
North-Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture and Winemaking
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Agric.), Chief Researcher,

39, 40 let Pobedy str., Krasnodar, 350901



I. A. Ilyina
North-Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture and Winemaking
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Tech.), professor, Deputy Director for Science, 

39, 40 let Pobedy str., Krasnodar, 350901



V. S. Petrov
North-Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture and Winemaking
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Agric.), Head of Federal Research Center “Viticulture”, 

39, 40 let Pobedy str., Krasnodar, 350901



G. K. Kiseleva
North-Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture and Winemaking
Russian Federation

PhD. Sci. (Biol.), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher,

39, 40 let Pobedy str., Krasnodar, 350901



N. M. Zaporozhets
North-Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture and Winemaking
Russian Federation

PhD. Sci. (Agric.), Scientific Secretary,

39, 40 let Pobedy str., Krasnodar, 350901



V. V. Sokolova
North-Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture and Winemaking
Russian Federation

PhD. Sci. (Agric.), Head of Scientific and Educational Sector,

39, 40 let Pobedy str., Krasnodar, 350901



References

1. Nenko N. I., Ilyina I. A., Petrov V. S., Sundyreva M. A., Zaporozhets N. M., Kiseleva G. K. Resistance of grape varieties to drought in the Anapo-Taman zone, Vestnik Rossiyskoy sel’skokhozyaystvennoy nauki. 2019;5:45-51. (In Russ.)

2. Nenko N. I., Ilina I. A., Kiselеva G. K., Sundyreva M. A. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of grape varieties of different ecological and geoghraphical origin to the stress factors of summer season, Austrian Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences. 2017;1-2:3-11.

3. Nenko N. I., Kiseleva G. K., Shalyakho T. V. Drought resistance of grape varieties according to physiological and anatomical and morphological parameters. In the Сollection «Fundamental and applied research: problems and results: mater. of IV Int. Scientific-practical Conf.» Novosibirsk, 2013: 31-35. (In Russ.)

4. Turmanidze T. I. Climate and grape yield. Leningrad, 1981, 223 p.

5. Ryndin A. V., Belous O. G., Malyarovskaya V. I., Pritula Z. V., Abilfazova Yu. S., Kozhevnikova A. M. The use of physiological and biochemical methods to identify the mechanisms of adaptation of subtropical, southern fruit and ornamental crops in the subtropics of Russia, Sel’skokhozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2014;3:40-48.

6. Yordanov I., Velikova V., Tsonev T. Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance, Photosynthetica. 2000;2(38):171-186.

7. Conesa M. R., De La Rosa J. M., Domingo R., Banon S. Changes induced by water stress on water relations, stomatal behaviour and morphology of table grapes (cv. Crimson Seedless) grown in pots, Scientia Horticulturae. 2016;202(20):9-16. DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.02.002.

8. Serra A., Strever P., Myburgh A., Deloire A. Review: the interaction between rootstocks and cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to enhance drought tolerance in grapevine, Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2014;20:1-14.

9. Kushnirenko M. D. Methods for studying water exchange and drought resistance of fruit plants: guidelines. Chişinău: Ştiinţa, 1970, 80 p. (In Russ.)

10. Gavrilenko V. F., Ladygina M. E., Khandobina L. M. Large workshop on plant physiology. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1975, 380 p. (In Russ.)

11. Dospekhov B. A. Field experiment technique. Moscow: Kolos, 1985, 352 p. (In Russ.)

12. Udovenko G. V. Diagnostics of plant resistance to stress. Leningrad: VIR, 1988, 227 p. (In Russ.)

13. Arestova N. O., Ryabchun I. O. Peculiarities of the influence of water content in shoots on the stress resistance of various grape varieties. in the Collection: “Methods and ways of increasing stress resistance of fruit plants and grapes: mater. of scientific practical. conf.” Krasnodar, 2009:94-98. (In Russ.)

14. Panfilova O. V., Golyaeva O. D. Physiological peculiarities of adaptation of varieties and selected forms of red currant to drought and high temperatures, Sel’skokhozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2017;52(5):1056-1064 (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.5.1056rus

15. Luo Y. Y., Li R. X., Jiang Q. S., Bai R. Changes in the chlorophyll content of grape leaves could provide a physiological index for responses and adaptation to UV‐C radiation, Nordic Journal of Botany. 2019;23(14):1-11. DOI: 10.1111/njb.02314

16. Xiao F., Yang Z. Q., Lee K.W. Photosynthetic and physiological responses to high temperature in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves during the seedling stage, The Journal of Horticultural Science and biotechnology. 2017;92(1):2-10. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2016.1211493


Review

For citations:


Nenko N.I., Ilyina I.A., Petrov V.S., Kiseleva G.K., Zaporozhets N.M., Sokolova V.V. Drought resistance of grape varieties of various ecological and geografical origin. Horticulture and viticulture. 2020;(5):37-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31676/0235-2591-2020-5-37-41

Views: 748


ISSN 0235-2591 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9003 (Online)