Preview

Horticulture and viticulture

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Woolly whitefly in agrocenoses of citrus crops of Abkhazia and the eff ectiveness of chemical plant protection products

https://doi.org/10.31676/0235-2591-2022-4-48-55

Abstract

The woolly whitefly (Aleurothrixus floccosus Maskell), a species of neotropical origin, is a new pest of mandarin orange in Abkhazia. The invasive range of the species has been developing since 1959 and now covers Europe, North America, Africa, the Middle East and East Asia. It was recorded in Abkhazia in spring, 2017. The studies were conducted in 2016-2021 in all regions of Abkhazia by means of standard methods. According to the six-year study of the distribution and development of the phytophage population in the territory of Abkhazia, the species has dramatically increased in number and spread throughout all regions of the country. The identification of the pest was carried out in 2020, but the vector of its penetration into Abkhazia is yet to be clarified. Most likely, A. floccosus was introduced in Abkhazia with planting material of citrus crops. The first colonies of woolly whitefly are recorded in late May-June, followed by a rapid growth of the pest population. The development of the colony reaches its maximum by September, with a density of imago and nymphs of 102.2-152.3 units/leaf. The bioefficacy of different chemical insecticides was evaluated: organophosphorus compounds (Bi-58 Top, KE, with dimethoate as an active ingredient, consumption rate of 2 l/ha), neonicotinoids (Confidor Extra, VDG, active ingredient: imidacloprid, consumption rate of 0.4 kg/ha and Gazelle, RP, active ingredient: acetamipride, consumption rate of 0.15 and 0.5 kg/ha), chitin synthesis inhibitors (Applaud, SP, active ingredient: buprofezin, consumption rate of 0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha). Trials were set in August-September. Treatment of plants was carried out in triplicate against the background of treatment with Product 30 Plus, MME (petroleum jelly oil), the consumption rate of 30 l/ha in the third part of February. At the beginning of the trial, one leaf of mandarin, on average, had 80.2-89.4 whiteflies. From mid-August till the end of September, the number of whitefly colonies increased 1.52 times in control. The use of the insecticide Confidor Extra, WDG, 0.4 kg/ha and variants with increased rates of consumption of insecticides Apploud, SP, 1.0 kg/ha and Gazelle, RP, 0.5 kg/ha (triple treatment) appeared to be the most effective with the biological efficiency of 80.0, 86.7 and 85.8 %, respectively. Dimethoate-based organophosphorus insecticide, traditionally used in agrocenoses of citrus crops, showed insufficient effectiveness (70.0 %).

About the Authors

L. D. Kulava
Federal Research Center the Subtropical Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of agriculture of Academy of sciences of Abkhazia
Russian Federation

Postgraduate student; Senior Researcher

Sochi

Sukhum, Abkhazia



L. Ya. Ayba
Institute of agriculture of Academy of sciences of Abkhazia
Abkhazia

Dr. Sci. (Agric.), Director

Sukhum



N. N. Karpun
Federal Research Center the Subtropical Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Natalia N. Karpun, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Chief Researcher, Associate Professor

2/28, Yana Fabritsiusa str., Sochi, 354002



E. I. Shoshina
Federal Research Center the Subtropical Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Junior researcher

Sochi



E. V. Mikhailova
Federal Research Center the Subtropical Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

PhD (Biol.), Head of the Plant Protection Department

Sochi



References

1. Martynov V. V., Nikulina T. V. Characteristics of insect orders. With key tables. Donetsk: Noulidzh, 2011, 371 p. (In Russ.)

2. Soto А., Ohlenschläeger F., García-marí F. Distribution and Sampling of the whiteflies Aleurothrixus floccosus, Dialeurodes citri, and Parabemisia myricae (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Citrus in Spain, Journal of Economic Entomology. 2002;95(1):167- 173. DOI:10.1603/0022-0493-95.1.167

3. Arulappan J., Evans G.A., Mohan C., Babu M., Meerasahib A.K., Muthu A., Hegde V. Morphological and molecular identification of the woolly whitefly, Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell), International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 2022. DOI:10.1007/s42690-022-00777-8

4. Gilbertson R. L., Batuman O., Webster C. G., Adkins S. Role of the insect super vectors Bemisia tabaci and Frankliniella occidentalis in the emergence and global spread of plant viruses, Annual Review of Virology. 2015;2:67–93. DOI:10.1146/annurev-virology-031413-085410

5. Aiba L. Ya., Karpun N. N., Ignatova E. A., Shinkuba M. Sh., Kulyan R. V., Akaba Yu. G., Protsenko V. E. Atlas of pests and diseases of citrus crops on the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus. Sukhum-Sochi, 2018, 205 p. (In Russ.)

6. Aleurothrixus floccosus (woolly whitefly) [Electronic resource]. 2021. Access mode: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/4538. Data mode: 10.12.2021.

7. Katsoyannos P. First record of Aleurothrixus floccosus (Mask.) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Greece and some observations on its phenology, Entomol. Hell. 1991;9:69-72.

8. Mercado V. T ., Fernández E. S., Jan H. Life table parameters of the woolly whitefly Aleurothrixus floccosus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and its parasitoid Cales noacki (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), Eur. J. Entomol. 2014;111(2):251-256.

9. Onillon J. C. The use of natural enemies for the biological control of whitefl ies. In: Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management (Ed. by D. Gerling). Intercept, Andover, UK, 1990, 287-313.

10. Abbassi M. The presence in Morocco of a new species of Aleyrodid Aleurothrixus floccosus Maskell. (Homoptera, Aleurodidae). (Presence au Maroc d’une nouvelle espece d’aleurode Aleurothrixus floccosus Maskell. (Homoptera, Aleurodidae)), Bulletin SROP [Section Regionale Ouest Palearctique]. 1975, 173-176.

11. Magalhaes G. S. Note on the introduction of Aleurothrixus floccosus (Mask.) (Homoptera, Aleurodidae) in south Portugal and its control by Cales noacki How. (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Proceedings of the International symposium of IOBC/WPRS on integrated control in agriculture (Vienna, 1979-10-/12). Vienna, 1980, 572-573.

12. Vulic M., Beltran J.L. Die Weisse Fliege Aleurothrixus floccosus, ein gefahrlicher Schadling der Citrus-Kulturen, Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz. 1977;84(4):202-214.

13. Argov Y. The woolly whitefly, a new pest in Israel, Alon Hanotea. 1994;48(6):290-292.

14. Anagnou-Veroniki M., Papaioannou-Souliotis P., Karanastasi E., Giannopolitis C.N. New records of plant pests and weeds in Greece, 1990-2007, Hellenic Plant Protection Journal. 2008;1(2):55-78.

15. Chermiti B., Onillon J.C., Dali M., Messelmani H. Control of the woolly whitefly, Aleurothrixus floccosus (Hom., Aleurodidae) by the parasitoid, Cales noacki (Hymenopt., Aphelinidae), Bulletin OILB-SROP. 1993;16(7):86-98.

16. Öztemiz S., Doğanlar M. Invasive plant pests (Insecta and Acarina) of Turkey, Munis Entomology & Zoology. 2015;10(1):144-159.

17. Malumphy C. Woolly whitefly, Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), a pest of ornamental Citrus, new to Britain, Entomologist’s Gazette. 1995;46(3):217-220.

18. Mifsud D., Viggiani G., Dandria D., Lanfranco E. Whitefly parasitoids from the Maltese Islands, The Central Mediterranean Naturalist. 1995;2(3):101-107.

19. EPPO Reporting Service no. 04–1997. Aleurothrixus floccosus found for the first time in Cyprus [Electronic resource]. Num. article: 1997/80. Access mode: https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-3809. Data mode: 10.01.2022.

20. Malumphy C., Radonjić S., Hrnčić S., Raičević M. () New data on the whiteflies (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of Montenegro, including three species new for the country, Acta entomologica serbica. 2015;20:29-41. doi:10.5281/zenodo.44654

21. Šimala M., Pintar M., Milek T.M., Markotić V. Results of a two year survey (2015-2016) of quarantine whitefly species from genus Aleurocanthus Quaintance & Baker 1914 on citrus in Croatia // Proceedings of the 13th Slovenian Conference on Plant Protection (Rimske Toplice, SI, 2017-03-07/08). 2017, 278-283.

22. Yakobashvili G. T., Partsvania M. Sh., Loladze Z. P. Species composition of whiteflies - pests of citrus plantations in Georgia, Zashchita i karantin rasteniy. 2021;1:45-46. (In Russ.)

23. Kerns D., Wright G., Loghry J. Wooly Whiteflies (Aleurothrixus floccosus) [Electronic resource]. 2021. Access mode: URL: https://cals.arizona.edu/crop/citrus/insects/woolywhitefly.pdf. Data mode: 10.12.2021.

24. Tello V., Peralta O., Rioja T. Voltinism of Aleurothrixus floccosus Maskel (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in an oasis agroecosystem in the Atacama Desert, Tarapacá Region, Chile, IDESIA (Chile). 2019;37(1):5-7. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-34292018005002303

25. Forecast of occurrence and accounting of pests and diseases of agricultural crops. Eds. V. V. Koiva, I. Ya. Polyakov, Moscow, 1958, 626 p. (In Russ.)

26. Dunaev E. A. Methods of ecological and entomological research. Moscow: MosgorSYUN, 1997, 44 p. (In Russ.)

27. Pikushova E. A., Veretelnik E. Yu. Guidelines for educational practice in the course “Plant Protection”. Krasnodar, 2009, 71 p. (In Russ.)

28. Guidelines for registration testing of insecticides, acaricides, molluscicides and rodenticides in agriculture. Ed. V.I. Dolzhenko. St. Petersburg: VIZR, 2009, 322 p. (In Russ.)

29. Ayba L. Ya., Karpun N. N., Kulava L. D., Shoshina E. I., Sabekia D. A. Resistance of citrus crops in Abkhazia to damage by the woolly whitefly Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell), IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;723:022057. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/723/2/022057

30. Pesticides [Electronic resource]. 2022. Access mode: https://www.pesticidy.ru. Access date: 03/15/2022. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Kulava L.D., Ayba L.Ya., Karpun N.N., Shoshina E.I., Mikhailova E.V. Woolly whitefly in agrocenoses of citrus crops of Abkhazia and the eff ectiveness of chemical plant protection products. Horticulture and viticulture. 2022;(4):48-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31676/0235-2591-2022-4-48-55

Views: 651


ISSN 0235-2591 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9003 (Online)