Preview

Horticulture and viticulture

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A biological method for managing the yield of Libya grape variety on a 41B Rootstock

https://doi.org/10.31676/0235-2591-2022-6-48-53

Abstract

Advances in grapevine biotechnology are associated with manipulation of vegetative and generative plant organs, effective use of the soil and climate potential of agricultural lands, and biological features of grape genotypes. Grapevine biotechnology allows grape productivity to be increased without additional investments. In this work, we studied table grapes of the Libya variety grafted onto a ChasselasV. Berlandieri 41B rootstock to determine variations in grape productivity depending on the different load of vines with shoots and bunches. The research was carried out in the Central Agroecological Zone of Viticulture (fourth subzone) of the Krasnodar Krai, in vineyards with drip irrigation and covered viticulture. The vines were planted according to a 3.8×2.0 m scheme with a density of 1316 plants per hectare. The vines were supported with a high-trunk two-arm horizontal cordon system. The average annual air temperature at the experimental site equaled +12.5... 13.0 °С; the sum of active temperatures was 3 900-4 100 °С; the maximum temperature during vegetation reached +40 °С; the minimum temperature of -30 °С was recorded in winters during dormancy. The annual precipitation level comprised 700-800 mm. The soils were low-humus, leached powerful chernozems. In terms of productivity, grapes of the Livia variety respond effectively to canopy management techniques. In this work, changes in bunch weight and grape yield were monitored depending on the load of vines with shoots and bunches. Under the studied agroecological conditions, the largest bunch mass of 870 g was achieved at the lowest load of 20 shoots and 22 bunches per vine. The maximum grape yield of 36.3 t/ha was observed with an average load of 26 shoots per vine and the largest load of 37 bunches per vine. The dependence of yield on shoot number was rather low, r = 0.08; on bunch number was medium, r = 0.53; on bunch mass was high, r = 0.75. The largest share of marketable grape yield of 98% was achieved at the load of 20 shoots and 22 bunches per vine.

About the Authors

V. S. Petrov
North Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture, Wine-making
Russian Federation

Valery S. Petrov – Dr. Sci. (Agric.), Leading Researcher

9, 40-letiya Pobedy str., Krasnodar, 350901



A. V. Fisyura
Peasant farm «T. B. Fisyura»
Russian Federation

Fisyura A. V. – a member of the farm

Dinskoy District, Krasnodar Region



A. A. Marmorshtein
North Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture, Wine-making
Russian Federation

Marmorshtein A. A. – Postgraduate Student, Junior Researcher

Krasnodar



References

1. Abeysinghe S., Greer D., Rogiers S. The effect of light intensity and temperature on berry growth and sugar accumulation in Vitis vinifera ‘Shiraz’ under vineyard conditions. Vitis – Geilweilerhof. 2019;58:7-16.

2. Nighttime temperature treatment of fruit clusters of ‘Akai Queen’ grapes during maturation and its effect on the skin color and abscisic acid content. Y. Koshita, T. Asakura, H. Fukuda, Y. Tsuchida. Vitis. 2007;46(4):208-209.

3. Caprio J. M., Quamme H. A. Weather conditions associated with grape production in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia and potential impact of climate change. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2002;82(4):755-763.

4. Szenteleki K., Ladanja M., Gaal M., Zanathy G., Bisztray Jy. Climatic risk factors of Central Hungarian grape growing regions. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2012;10(1):87-105.

5. Kubota N., Tsuchiya M. Effects of irradiation with ultrafiolet – a lamp on coloration of grape berries during maturation: scient. rep. Fac. Agr. Okayama Univ. 2002;91:55-60.

6. Yakuba Yu. F. Technological measures to protect heat-loving fruit crops under winter stress. Fruit growing and viticulture of the South of Russia [Electronic resource]. Krasnodar: NCZSRIHV. 2013;22 (4):127-134. (In Rus)

7. Alimentation en eau et comportement du Pinot noir: bilan d’un essai dans le vignoble de Chamoson (VS) / J.-L. Spring, V. Zuff erey, T. Verdenal, O. Viret. Rev. suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic. 2010;42(4):258-266.

8. Petrov V. S., Mishko A. E., Sundyreva M. A., Tsiku D. M., Marmorshtein A. A. Features of the physiological adaptation of photosynthesis of new hybrid forms of table grapes in the summer period. Magarach. Viticulture and winemaking. 2021;23(1):15-20. (In Rus)

9. Egorov E. A., Petrov V. S., Lysenko S. N., Lysenko A. S., Dudinov A. V. Formation of highly productive vineyards in the Stavropol Territory based on assortment optimization. Winemaking and viticulture. 2008;3:28-29. (In Rus)

10. Rasulov A. T. Growing of high-qualitative table grapes for storage and transportation. Annals of Agrarian Science. 2017;15(4):439-442.

11. Kurtural S.K., Dami I.E., Taylor B.H. Effects of pruning and cluster thinning on yield and fruit composition of ‘chambourcin’ grapevines. HortTechnology. 2017;15(4):439-442.

12. Kliewer W.M., Dokoozlian N.K. Leaf area/crop weight ratios of grapevines: Influence on fruit composition and wine quality. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2005;56(2):170-181.

13. Matuzok N. V., Troshin L. P., Gorlov S. M. Forecasting the grape harvest and establishing the optimal load of bushes when pruning in the eyes according to the planned yield on the example of OAO AF Yuzhnaya. Polythematic network electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University2016; 116:355-372. (In Rus)

14. Guseynov Sh. N., Mayborodin S. V., Manatskov A. G. Influence of the norm of the load of bushes with shoots on the productivity of the vineyard. Russian grapes. 2019;10:89-94. (In Rus)

15. Guseynov Sh. N. Methods of maintenance, formation and pruning of uncovered vineyards in the conditions of the south of Russia. Magarach. Viticulture and winemaking. 2018;20(3(105)):12-14. (In Rus)

16. Guseynov Sh. N., Serdyukova V. V., Pogorelkina N. V. Influence of the vine pruning method and the bush load rate on the productivity of high-stem vineyards. Russian grapes. 2015;1:153-161. (In Rus)

17. Boos M., Jorger V. Johanniter und Cabernet Carol – Erziehungssysteme. Bad. Winzer. 2006;9:18-20.

18. Pruning effects on Pinot Noir vines in Tasmania (Australia). Heazlewood J.E. other. Vitis. 2006;45(4):165-171.

19. Terry D. B., Kurtural S. K. Achieving vine balance of syrah with mechanical canopy management and regulated deficit irrigation. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2011;62(4):426-437.

20. Petrov V. S., Aleinikova G. Yu., Marmorshtein A. A. Research methods in viticulture. Krasnodar: FGBSI NCFSCHVW, 2021. 146 p. (In Rus)

21. Dospekhov B. A. Method of field experiment. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985, 351 p. (In Rus)

22. Petrov V. S., Aleinikova G. Yu., Marmorshtein A.A. Agroecological zoning of the territory to optimize the placement of varieties, sustainable viticulture and quality winemaking: monograph. Krasnodar: FGBSI NCFSCHVW, 2020. 138 p. (In Rus)


Review

For citations:


Petrov V.S., Fisyura A.V., Marmorshtein A.A. A biological method for managing the yield of Libya grape variety on a 41B Rootstock. Horticulture and viticulture. 2022;(6):48-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31676/0235-2591-2022-6-48-53

Views: 345


ISSN 0235-2591 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9003 (Online)